Lalit Shastri
When one opens a Western textbook on music theory, the usual narrative begins in ancient Greece—with Pythagoras discovering musical intervals while walking past a blacksmith’s shop, noting the harmonic beauty of sounds created by hammers of proportional weights. From this story flows the foundational Western framework of acoustics, intervals, and harmony, built upon ratios such as 2:1 (octave), 3:2 (perfect fifth), and 4:3 (perfect fourth). But this familiar tale, however elegant, obscures an even more ancient and richly textured tradition: the Indian subcontinent’s contributions to music theory, dating back to the Vedic age and encoded in texts centuries older than Pythagoras.
The Vedic Soundscape: A Codified Tradition
The earliest textual evidence of music theory in India appears in the Sāma Veda, composed well before Pythagoras (ca. 570–495 BCE). The Sāma Veda is not merely a liturgical scripture but a systematic musical document—its verses were meant to be chanted in specific melodic patterns called Sāmagāna. These chants used a codified set of tonal pitches, or swaras, forming the precursors to India’s seven-note system (Shadja, Rishabha, Gandhara, Madhyama, Panchama, Dhaivata, and Nishada), which parallels the Western solfège system (Do-Re-Mi…).
The Chāndogya Upaniṣad, one of the principal Upaniṣads, goes further to explore the metaphysical dimension of sound and intervals, relating cosmic order to musical structure. It outlines not only the swaras but also the interdependence of pitch, emotion, and consciousness—a conceptual framework absent in the Greek model.
The Sulba Sutras and Acoustic Ratios
Much before Euclid’s Elements and Pythagorean tuning, India’s Sulba Sutras — part of the larger Śrauta ritual tradition — described geometric and mathematical principles, including the use of string lengths in ratios such as 3:2 and 4:3 for altar construction. These are precisely the same ratios that undergird Western musical intervals, indicating a parallel evolution—or possibly an earlier origin—in India.
The use of string length to determine pitch was explicitly detailed in these texts. Ancient Indian musicologists had already theorized how shortening a string by half doubles the pitch (2:1 ratio), and how tuning systems could be based on arithmetic and geometric progressions—a core idea in both Indian and later Greek music theory.
Nāṭyaśāstra: The First Complete Musicological Treatise
Compiled by Bharata Muni, the Nāṭyaśāstra is perhaps the world’s earliest extant comprehensive treatise on performing arts, including music, drama, and dance. Unlike the narrowly mathematical approach of Greek theory, the Nāṭyaśāstra integrates music with aesthetics (rasa), psychology (bhāva), and ethics (dharma).
Its chapters on gāna śāstra (science of music) lay out:
- The 22 śrutis (microtonal divisions of the octave)
- Detailed descriptions of jāti (proto-rāgas) and mūrchana (modal scales)
- Instrument classifications based on sound production (a system that predates Curt Sachs and Erich von Hornbostel by over a millennium)
Here, Indian theory presents not only scale construction but also the dynamic emotive potential of modes, a precursor to the rāga system—arguably the most emotionally and structurally sophisticated modal system in the world.
Transmission of Ideas: A Forgotten Dialogue
There is growing scholarly consensus that Indian philosophical and scientific ideas traveled westward via ancient trade and cultural exchange routes, passing through Persia and Egypt before reaching Greece. Thomas McEvilley, in his seminal work The Shape of Ancient Thought, presents compelling linguistic and philosophical parallels between Indian and Greek thought, including in music.
Alain Daniélou, a musicologist trained in both Western and Indian traditions, argues that India’s tuning systems and musical cosmology prefigure many concepts later attributed to the Greeks. The idea of rasa, which links aesthetic experience with musical expression, has no equivalent in classical Western theory until the much later Romantic era.
Western Music Theory and Eurocentrism
To be clear, Greek music theory deserves its place in history—particularly in developing formal mathematics-based approaches to harmony, leading eventually to the Western tonal system, counterpoint, and the tempered scale. However, the portrayal of Greek thinkers as the originators of music theory is not only inaccurate but also deeply Eurocentric.
Modern AI models and academic materials often default to this Greek-first narrative, not because of malice, but due to historical conditioning shaped by colonial-era scholarship. Correcting this means not just adding Indian names as an afterthought but genuinely restructuring the timeline of human intellectual achievement to reflect simultaneity, multiplicity, and non-linear influence.
To Sum Up
Music is a universal language, but the story of its grammar must not be told in a single accent. The ancient Indian contributions to music theory—systematic, mathematically precise, emotionally profound—deserve recognition not as peripheral wisdom but as central pillars in the architecture of world music.
In an age of AI-driven knowledge systems, we must demand models that represent global heritage with accuracy and integrity. Decentering the Western canon is not about diminishing it; it is about lifting other voices that have been historically silenced or sidelined.
Importantly, the evolution of music across millennia has never been a linear or insular journey. It has been guided by two vital processes: vertical acculturation—the deepening and transmission of knowledge within a cultural continuum—and horizontal acculturation—the cross-cultural dialogue and synthesis of musical ideas across geographies and civilizations.
Vertical acculturation gave rise to enduring lineages: from the ritualistic chants of the Sāma Veda to the melodic complexity of the rāga system; from Bharata’s Nāṭyaśāstra to the pedagogies of the gurukul and gharana traditions. It ensured that the internal evolution of music remained anchored in memory, philosophy, and performance practice across centuries.
Meanwhile, horizontal acculturation facilitated vibrant exchanges—between Indian and Persian tonalities, Arab maqams and Indian thaats, Central Asian rhythms and European counterpoint. These interactions enriched musical vocabularies globally, allowing ideas to migrate, mingle, and metamorphose. The very instruments we revere today—like the sitar, oud, violin, tabla, and piano—are outcomes of such fertile crossings.
What we recognize today as music theory is not the legacy of a single origin, but rather a grand, collaborative architecture—layered through time and braided across cultures. Recognizing this shared heritage not only honors the diverse roots of global music, but also challenges us to see beauty not just in the notes, but in the relationships that created them.
As we listen to a rāga in Bhopal or a Bach fugue in Berlin, let us remember: the harmonies we cherish today were not born in one place or time. They are echoes from many civilizations, resonating in unison across continents and centuries—tuned together by both memory and exchange, by shruti and logos, by rasa and ethos—all bound by the eternal human longing to transform silence into song.
This is News 